?

Log in

No account? Create an account
So, in the interest of being able to wear more than 30% of the pants… - The Veritable TechNinja [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
The Veritable TechNinja

[ website | ~/public_html ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

[Jan. 25th, 2007|12:03 pm]
The Veritable TechNinja
[status |hungryhungry]

So, in the interest of being able to wear more than 30% of the pants I currently own, I looked up the nutrition info for the lunches I usually eat, then the lowest calorie meal that I could eat. Guess which fast food place won? Wendy's? Arby's? McDonalds!?! Nope. Burger King. A Tendergrill combo with onion rings and sauce is 660 calories. Fucked up. Further evidence toward branding being completely bass-ackwards is that Wendy's is the worst, at 880 calories for an Ultimate Chicken Grill and small fries. McDonalds, subjects of indie film ridicule, beat them by 110 calories. Bizarro!
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: arcsine
2007-01-25 08:22 pm (UTC)
I'M HELPING! I'M HELPING YOUUUUUUU!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)